Featured Post

NEWSMAX: Why the Border Wall must be built

Why the Border Wall Must Be Built A part of the ancient Hadrian's wall in northern England.(Juliane Jacobs/Dreamstime) By  Chu...

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

NEWSMAX: Why the Border Wall must be built

Why the Border Wall Must Be Built

Image: Why the Border Wall Must Be Built
A part of the ancient Hadrian's wall in northern England.(Juliane Jacobs/Dreamstime)
By Tuesday, 19 Sep 2017 03:46 PMCurrent | Bio | Archive
The building of a wall to determine who enters the national home of any nation is as logical and as natural as are the walls and fences that enclose our own homes and yards. Even the animal kingdom understands the importance of boundaries and the right to determine who enters their space. Beavers establish their turf with dams, birds with nests, ants with underground colonies and bees with hives.
At the dawn of civilization, people gathered together to construct walls around their cities for safety. We understand this natural principle today when we establish militaries and police and when we lock the doors to our homes and cars. Ancient Rome built walls across northern Europe and Britain to contain invasions by Germans and Scots. China built a great wall to contain the Mongols. The wall around Constantinople protected the Eastern Roman Empire for over a thousand years. Today, Israel has a barrier that has reduced suicide bombing by 95 percent. In his poem “Mending Wall” American poet laureate Robert Frost acknowledged this natural institution when he wrote: Good fences make good neighbors.
Americans understand that inherent in the concept of property is the right to determine its usage. The individual and the family thus retains the lawful right to determine who enters their home and how long the invitation is extended. Several amendments to the U.S. Constitution expressly delineatethis right. Violators commit a form of coercion that could raise to the level of breaking and entering. Such violations are a form of theft.
The sovereign nation acts as the protector of the national home and, as such, the government is empowered with the responsibility to determine who enters. For the same reason that the individual is under no obligation to explain why he or she denies the entry of any person into their private home, the nation owes no such explanation for its immigration or visa policies. There is no such thing as a right, either in nature or in international law and custom, for any person to travel without a permit from one nation to another.
Yet today we are confronted with the inexplicable and bizarre phenomena of politicians suggesting that our nation should not protect our border from intruders who have not obtained proper permission to enter. These same politicians would be loath to assume this same stance regarding their own private homes. We are told that an open border is somehow a virtue and that our opposition to it is regressive and prejudiced.
These same politicians project the principle, perhaps unwittingly, that all borders, that all separations between people, that private property and, at the core, that individual identity itself is regressive and prejudiced. This may not be their conscious intention in refusing to secure the national home but this is, de facto, the philosophy that they uphold. Therefore their support of the insane policy of open borders is usually expressed incoherently and in a jargon of vague obfuscation.
The central promise of the candidacy of Donald Trump was that he would build the wall. This was the main reason why he was elected. Now President Trump appears to be waffling on this promise as he talks about fences, drones, increases in law enforcement and the like. While President Trump deserves congratulations for the 70 percent reduction in newly arriving illegal aliens, for detaining and deporting dangerous criminals, and for strengthening points of entry we must hold him to his promise to build the wall.
The wall would serve both as a permanent barrier against unannouncedguests and as a permanent break on the globalist ambitions of future politicians who might harbor bad intentions.
Chuck Morse is a radio host who broadcasts live Thursday's at 10 a.m. ET at WMFO-Tufts. Chuck hosts the podcast "Chuck Morse Speaks" on iTunes and Stitcher and his books are available on Amazon.com. For more of his reports — Click Here Now.

Thursday, September 14, 2017

Tufts guide calls Israel: "White Supremacist State

New episode from
Chuck Morse

"Tufts guide calls Israel: "White Supremacist State""


Fresh off the press!
Chuck Morse just published a new podcast episode.

Listen to it now

Podcasters love their craft and love their listeners even more. Show you care, share this episode and spread the word!

Monday, September 11, 2017

Newsmax: Donald Trump Is the First Anti-Fascist President

Donald Trump Is the First Anti-Fascist President

Image: Donald Trump Is the First Anti-Fascist President
U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he and First Lady Melania Trump make their way across the South Lawn to board Marine One, bound for Camp David, on September 8, 2017, in Washington, D.C. (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
By Monday, 11 Sep 2017 03:08 PMCurrent | Bio | Archive
Unlike black leather masked communist Antifa totalitarians and their left-wing and liberal enablers, Donald Trump is the first anti-fascist president. He has already rescinded many of the executive orders that were issued by President Barack Obama who bypassed Congress, the representatives of the people, and who thus accelerated the fascistic trend of recent presidents who likewise tended to govern more like monarchs or, it could be argued, fascist dictators.
Bill Clinton advisor Paul Begala once described this fascistic trend to The New York Times, July 5, 1998, when, referring to executive orders he said: "Stroke of the pen. Law of the Land. Kinda cool."
Barack Obama famously told his cabinet: "I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone – and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward." Obama created laws out of thin air, such as DACA, while ignoring laws that he didn’t like such as border enforcement. Obama appointed judges with the same authoritarian orientation.
President Trump is returning immigration policy to its rightful constitutional source, the people’s representatives in Congress. He is asking Congress to assume its rightful constitutional responsibility to legislate in areas of immigration, healthcare, and taxes. As president, he will then have the prerogative to either sign or veto those laws. If a veto is issued, Congress can attempt to over-ride the veto. This is how the system of checks and balances works and, indeed, this is why America is not fascist.
Increasing numbers of Americans, particularly college students, have either forgotten or probably never learned how America works, how our government holds limited powers which leaves maximum power at its source, with the individual citizen under God. By this means, the minority is protected from the mob and the most vulnerable minority is the individual. In his inaugural address President Trump made his intention clear:
"We are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People. For too long, a small group in our nation’s Capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost."
Trump is trying to drain the swamp of the truly fascistic authoritarians, bureaucrats who make laws which they euphemistically call other names such as guidelines. These unelected and unaccountable mandarins remain in power regardless of who is elected. They are the so-called dark state and they represent an incremental slide toward a European style Fascism that was rejected when the founders declared independence from the tyrant King George III.
Trump is standing up to political correctness, the great cultural weapon in the fascist arsenal. He is knocking those grenades out of the hands of the left who, enabled by their media allies, can destroy their effectiveness of their enemies with bully boy tactics, by calling them names like “racist.” It is they, in fact, who are race obsessed as they push the same destructive racist ideas and policies that they have been peddling since the 1960’s. President Trump is pulling their masks off by supporting pro-business policies such as tax cuts and slashing onerous regulations. Trump opposes endless foreign wars, he favors trade agreements that benefit American industry and labor, he is removing the blank check from foreign nations, he supports measures that reduce the corrupt aspects of the fascistic nanny-state.
Trump is the first businessman to be elected president in a nation that is primarily made up of businessmen. As such, he is the antithesis of the fascist who seeks government control over business. An essential difference between Fascism and Communism, which are both leftist political experiments in mass control, is that Fascism offers monopoly power to select businesses who become governing partners while the Communist system constitutes a singular and massive state-run corporation that controls everything. Fascism views society through the collectivist lens of race and group identity while Communism focuses on the collectivism of class identity. Thus, Fascism promotes race consciousness and Communism promotes class consciousness. The American system is the exact opposite in that America promotes individual consciousness and empowerment. Donald Trump epitomizes this principle.
Chuck Morse is a radio host who broadcasts live Thursday's at 10 a.m. ET at WMFO-Tufts. Chuck hosts the podcast "Chuck Morse Speaks" on iTunes and Stitcher and his books are available on Amazon.com. For more of his reports — Click Here Now.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Was Obama Fascist? Why the left hates Israel

New episode from
Chuck Morse

"Was Obama Fascist? Why the left hates Israel"


Fresh off the press!
Chuck Morse just published a new podcast episode.

Listen to it now

Podcasters love their craft and love their listeners even more. Show you care, share this episode and spread the word!

Newsmax: Trump's Downfall the Only Motive of Those Claiming Russia Ties

Tags: manafort | podesta

Trump's Downfall the Only Motive of Those Claiming Russia Ties

Image: Trump's Downfall the Only Motive of Those Claiming Russia Ties
Special Counsel Robert J. Mueller (AP) 
By Tuesday, 05 Sep 2017 04:55 PMCurrent | Bio | Archive
A conspiracy occurs when two or more people come together in secret to plot a plan of action that is either illegal or subversive. There are good conspiracies, as was the case with the original Boston Tea Party and the plot to kill Hitler; there are false conspiracies such as any which are racist or anti-Semitic.
Logic dictates that it is impossible for an entire people to keep a secret. There are paranoid conspiracy theories such as those historically held by the Bolsheviks and the Nazis and those held by radical Islamists of today. They employed false conspiracy theories to gin up hatred while they themselves conspired to subvert the social order by means of force and fraud.
Yet conspiracies happen all the time. Criminal conspiracies that result in a murder or a major theft are the stuff of our nightly cop shows, popular novels and movies. We read and we watch as the conspiracy unravels and as the perpetrators are exposed and brought to justice. The main purpose of a responsible free press is to investigate and uncover both criminal and political conspiracies and to separate the wheat from the chaff.
As of now, the Trump-Russia connection remains an unproven conspiracy theory.
Unless reasonable evidence is presented that proves that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to hack the DNC emails and then tried to cover this up, which is the central tenet of the alleged conspiracy, then the whole enterprise remains nothing more than an unproven theory.
After over a year of investigations by two congressional committees, the FBI, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, proof remains elusive. At this point, unless reasonable evidence proves otherwise, it is not unreasonable to suggest that if any conspiracy has taken place, then the locus is probably with those who have made the conspiracy claim itself.
Indeed, at this point there is evidence suggesting that the Trump-Russia claims are part of a conspiracy to at best distract if not destabilize the Trump presidency. In this regard, it should be acknowledged that President Trump has at times acted as his own worst enemy as he has reacted impulsively to the possible traps set for him. His reactions are honorable, assuming there is no Trump-Russia conspiracy, as in that case he is protecting his reputation against lies.
Several questions call out for a widening of the investigation to get beyond the theories and at the truth. These include the question of why the Hillary Clinton campaign isn’t also being investigated for collusion with Russia given the extensive Russia contacts and business interactions between Russia and Clinton campaign manager John Podesta.
Why is only Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort being investigated? And what about the uranium sale to a Russian company that was authorized by Secretary Clinton which, according to The New York Times, was followed by million dollar donations to the Clinton Foundation and a quarter of a million speaking gig for former President Bill Clinton in Moscow?
Former FBI Director James B. Comey acknowledged under oath that he deliberately sought to trigger the appointment of a special counsel after his firing by turning over documents, some of which might have contained classified material, to a friend who went to the New York Times.
Special counsel Robert Muller, who has hired political appointments and democratic party donors, has been described as a close friend and mentor to James B. Comey. Why are the investigations only focusing on the Trump campaign as the source of collusion and not on former DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz with her connection to the Awad brothers, who were IT experts, one of whom fled the country for Pakistan in advance of a 4 count indictment. And what about the suspicious murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich?
Conspiracies require secrecy and careful planning by a few people who plot the action and then cover-up the evidence. Evidence so far, unless something tangible emerges to indicate otherwise, points in the direction of a possible conspiracy to falsely accuse President Trump of wrongdoing for political reasons.
Chuck Morse is a radio host who broadcasts live Thursday's at 10 a.m. ET at WMFO-Tufts. Chuck hosts the podcast "Chuck Morse Speaks" on iTunes and Stitcher and his books are available on Amazon.com. For more of his reports — Click Here Now.